Windows 3.1

I co-own Microsoft. It was me who decided upon and initiated the MS-DOS interrupts (and so on). Japan knows this fact, may have a military record of this MS-DOS interrupts thing. In Baguio, I was the one giving away Microsoft, Yahoo, and Google "email" accounts. That would mean money for them. There was a stable OS before from which we can derive again MS-DOS or probably Unix too. Also in Baguio. Windows is slow, co-existing with Intel microprocessors? Well, it's business. Just enough speed from Windows. One military strategies reason for this interest in modern  computers is to make these geniuses forget their Star Trek knowledge and knowledge of very advanced weapons tech, like nukes. So we had to slow down technology. I don't like massive World War again. 

I remember us developing Windows 3.1 while making Star Trek Voyager in the 1970s and in grade school I would go to DepEd building in Masbate to work on Windows 3.1 but they would discourage me. I took it as that they're already stealing my MS ownership. The DepEd building was actually ours, I would reiterate to them. Our huge houses are gone, being stolen from us!

It was like a review of Windows 3.1, bug fixes, or updates. But very early before that, Windows 95  and the later Windows OSes were already finished. 

One of my earliest business maneuvers or computer industry manipulations is for Microsoft to work with IBM to sell PC-DOS as MS-DOS.

It was Cold War, I was working for World Peace, manipulating the computer industry to satisfy very powerful groups by like scheduling their billion$ in a time-table of decades.

My timetable of decades which they eagerly followed, for the millions or billions, or for them to be on top.

I just chose to make me/us forget. Lay low for some time.

Now I need a few billion$ from Microsoft.